Archive for the ‘Science’ tag
Amazing Video: Inner Life of a Cell – Harvard Video
The soundtrack on this video is VERY technical and will likely not make sense unless you are a microbiologist (or something related). However, you don’t need to understand what the narrator is saying to perceive the incredible complexity being portrayed. This reminds me of Psalm 139:
For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother’s womb. I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful, I know that full well. Psalm 139
Watch Video (1)
1) Inner Life of the Cell animation conception and scientific content by Alain Viel and Robert A. Lue.
Animation by John Liebler/XVIVO.
Can Random Genetic Mutations provide Natural Selection the Raw Material it Requires to Create New Species?
Darwin Starts with a Populated Environment
Darwin’s theory of Decent with Modification through Natural Selection does not address how life began. Darwin’s theory attempts to explain how, over time, some members of a well marked species may begin to diverge in organic structure, habits, etc. into incipient (or emergent) species and eventually into an entirely new species. Darwin’s studies, observations, and postulations begin with an environment already significantly populated with organisms. For instance, in The Origin of Species chapter on the Struggle for Existence, the struggle is against numerous other competing species and is a central component to Darwin’s theory on Natural Selection.
Darwin states in The Origin of Species, Instinct chapter:
“I must premise, that I have nothing to do with the origin of the primary mental powers, any more than I have with that of life itself (1).”
Darwin’s definition of Natural Selection
Darwin states, in The Origin of Species:
“Can it, then, be thought improbable, seeing that variations useful to man [under domestic breeding] have undoubtedly occurred, that other variations useful in some way to each being in the great and complex battle for life, should sometimes occur in the course of thousands of generations? If such do occur, can we doubt that individuals having any advantage, however slight, over others, would have the best chance for surviving and of procreating their kind? On the other hand, we may feel sure that any variation in the least degree injurious would be rigidly destroyed. This preservation of favorable variations and the rejection of injurious variations, I call Natural Selection.” (1)
Louisiana Governor Signs ‘Science Education Act’
La. Governor Signs ‘Science Education Act’
By Alexander J. Sheffrin
Christian Post Reporter
Mon, Jun. 30 2008 03:58 PM EDT
Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal signed into law last week a measure that would grant teachers and students the freedom to challenge and examine critically the tenets of Darwinism in the classroom.
The so called “Science Education Act,” the latest in a series of academic freedom bills that have swept across as many as six states, cruised through the state legislature with unanimous levels of approval.
Lawmakers said that the new law will help bring an end to allegations that teachers and students who share views contradicting or challenging the tenets of Darwinism in the classroom are marginalized, discriminated, or ostracized.
The law will also help to supply teachers with supplementary textbooks that will give greater freedom in the classroom to analyze and critique existing scientific theories concerning evolution.
Read the rest of this entry »
Update on Louisiana Science Education Act – Evolution, Global Warming, Human Cloning
Science, Religion Sqare Off in Baton Rouge [LA]
Link to original article on WDSU.com website
Evolution is starting to lose ground within the public education system as more and more evidence from the study of the human genome is revealed that debunks the primary axiom of the Neo Darwinian Theory (NDT): Man is the product of random mutation and natural selection. As it turns out, random genetic mutation cannot be the mechanism that provides the phenotype variation required by NDT.
BATON ROUGE, La. — Arguments over science and religion have resumed at the state Capitol with a House panel approving a bill to let public school teachers offer alternatives to evolutionary theory and a Senate committee voting to ban government funding for what is often called “therapeutic cloning.”
Proponents said the bill approved Wednesday by the House Education Committee would promote “critical analysis” of scientific issues including cloning, evolution and global warming. Opponents said it is an attempt to inject religion into science classes.
The other bill, approved by the Senate Health and Welfare Committee, would outlaw government funding for therapeutic cloning – the asexual creation of an early stage human embryo for the harvesting of stem cells that scientists hope could be used to cure disease. Opponents said the process destroys human life.
Evolution and the Second Law of Thermodynamics
When I was attending Louisiana Tech University, I attended a class called Classical Thermodynamics as part of the Electrical Engineering curriculum. One of the curious things about the class was the particular book we used authored by Dr. Gordon J. Van Wylen and Dr. Richard E. Sonntag (Fundamentals of Classical Thermodynamics). This textbook was in its second edition then. I just checked and it is still available (7th edition) and considered the leading textbook in its field.
At the end of the chapter on the Second Law of Thermodynamics the authors state the following:
The final point to be made is that the second law of thermodynamics and the principle of the increase of entropy have philosophical implications. {skipped text} The authors see the second law of thermodynamics as man’s description of the prior and continuing work of the creator, who also holds the answer to the future destiny of man and the universe.
“Expelled – No Intelligence Allowed” – Are dissenting views of Evolution being suppressed by Academia?
The Dissent of Men and the Rise of their Oppressors – by Mark Looy, AiG-US
Here is a video interview with Ben Stein on “Expelled.”
Here is the movie’s official website.
Is life the product of billions of years and chance?
Big Science teaches that all living things are the product of time and chance as proposed by Neo-Darwinism or current evolutionary theory. It is taught in public schools as fact when it is at BEST a weak theory based on many unproven assumptions. However, as science marches forward, this theory is developing cracks and is beginning to crumble under the weight of serious scrutiny. Here I will document a few thought provoking “challenges” evolution faces.
Intelligence Gap
As I look around at nature, I see a huge amount of variety among both the plant and animal kingdom. You can almost sense a statistically uniform distribution of characteristics, attributes, etc. from least complex to most complex. For example, one could argue the difference in physical complexity between a chimpanzee and a human is not that great. Both have similarly complex DNA, organs, etc. However, there is at least one anomaly that can be observed – the gap in intelligence between humans and the next most intelligent life form. If one could measure and then graph the intelligence of all life forms, the graph might look like the following: